It should not be surprising that the World Health Organization, a branch of the United Nations, has been so aggressive in cheerleading for the Chinese government and its response to the coronavirus outbreak. After all, China's communist surveillance state model is a beta test for the type of centralization that the U.N. wants for the entire planet. They certainly aren't going to point out that it was China's totalitarian system that allowed the outbreak to spread from the very beginning.
Even now Xi Jinping is trying to rewrite history, claiming that he had been swift in responding to the crisis more than a month before he actually did.
Brave health workers like Li Wenliang, who was punished by the government for warning about the virus in December, have died in the process of trying to fight against the centralized behemoth just to get vital information to the world, but that never happened, right? It was actually president Xi and the CPC that saved the day. The WHO and the CPC say so. You'll never hear the U.N. praise the efforts of Li Wenliang, either; they want his name to disappear down the memory hole as much as the Chinese government does.
The developing narrative is a familiar one — local officials "stifled" the response to the outbreak while the centralized national leadership put things back on track with extreme control measures that have turned the Hubei province into a veritable internment camp. Whatever you do, don't point out that it was the national government's habit of imprisoning health officials that step out of line by releasing "false information" that led to the delayed reaction on the coronavirus. Also, don't point out that ground zero for the outbreak is only 20 miles down the road from the largest Level 4 Biohazard Lab in Asia, because that would make you a "conspiracy theorist."
The message is clear: Centralization works. Even when it fails miserably, it is still the answer to all our problems. All we have to do is "adjust" the historical record a little bit every time the system breaks and then institute even more centralization in response.
In other words, if the interdependent and draconian top-down structure of the globalist state leads to crisis, then it is because it was not centralized enough. Centralization always begets more centralization.
The financial fascist system of central banking and corporate oligarchy leads to socialist welfare state, and the socialist welfare state leads to the surveillance state, and the surveillance state leads to the martial law state, and the martial law state leads to full-on global governance; an endless elitist empire.The failings of centralization have caused numerous problems long before it led to a potential pandemic. The pandemic simply clarifies the issue. For example, the breakdown in the global supply chain is becoming a bigger threat by the day. Globalism has led to interdependent economies and nation states that no longer have redundancies in production. We have been forced to rely on production centers on the other side of the world for a vast majority of our goods. When China shuts down, the U.S. economy loses almost 20 percent of its supply chain. When Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Vietnam shut down, you can add another 5 percent to 10 percent on top of that. Retailers in the U.S. represent around 70 percent of GDP. Shut down the supply chain in Asia and retailers lose a vast array of goods to sell. The U.S. economy eventually shuts down also, even if the virus never spreads here. Now, some people will argue that we don't need all the "cheap plastic crap" from Asia anyway, and this situation is a "good thing." Sorry to break it to you, but America's economy is built on the selling of cheap plastic crap (along with the selling of the fiat dollar as the world reserve currency). Walmart (Chinamart if you discount agricultural products) is the largest employer in the U.S. and the world, after all. Right or wrong, our economic system is so globalized that the fall of the Chinese dominoes will eventually knock down our own dominoes. But when this disaster occurs and numerous national economies suffer from enforced globalist integration, guess what will happen next? The globalists will ride to our "rescue" with even greater centralization. This was their agenda all along. Many people in the liberty movement are now aware of the Event 201 simulation, a war game run by globalists in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum on a "theoretical" coronavirus pandemic that kills 65 million people. This simulation took place only a couple of months before the real thing exploded in China in December. But hey, maybe that's all just amazing coincidence. What concerns me even more is the solution that was presented at the end of Event 201 — the creation of a centralized global financial body that would manage the international response to the outbreak. Isn't it amazing how every major catastrophe caused by globalism seems to lead to more globalism? One might start to wonder if some of these events were triggered by incompetence, or if they were deliberately engineered. At the very least, crisis events have been allowed to fester unchecked by organizations like the WHO as they continue to write off the coronavirus as a non-issue that is well under control by a Chinese government that caused it to spread in the first place. So here is what is going to happen next: Best case scenario is that the Western world is mostly unscathed by the virus itself, but the economic supply chain suffers major setbacks. The global economy, which was already crashing due to historic levels of corporate and consumer debt, not to mention faltering exports and freight, is finally tipped over the edge. The massive Everything Bubble, fueled by a decade of inflationary central bank stimulus, implodes. Governments respond with totalitarian measures in the name of "protecting the public." Globalist institutions like the IMF step in and suggest that frail national monetary systems come under the management of their Special Drawing Rights basket in order to mitigate the debt crisis. Essentially, this is the first step to global governance. Worst case scenario, the virus spreads throughout the U.S. and Europe and our governments respond the same way China's government has; martial law and full-blown concentration camp culture. This leads to civil war in the U.S. because we are armed and will shoot anyone trying to put us into quarantine camps. Europe is mostly screwed. The establishment suggests that paper money be removed from the system because it is a viral spreader. China is already suggesting this solution now. Magically, we find ourselves in a cashless society in a matter of a year or two; which is what the globalists have been demanding for years. Everything goes digital, and thus completely centralized as private trade dies. Again, this might be an engineered event, or it might simply be that the globalists are exploiting a natural outbreak. Either way, they are not going to let a good crisis go to waste. Whether or not they succeed is dependent on several factors, but mostly, its dependent on us. How many people will buy into the notion that centralization is the answer to our problems? How many people will realize that centralization is thecause of all our problems? And how many people will fight to prevent ultimate centralization under the psychopathic globalist cult? A viral outbreak is a significant danger to us all, but an even greater threat is the supposed cure. Trading our economic and social freedom in the name of stopping the coronavirus? It's just not worth it.
To truth and knowledge, Brandon Smith
| 
发表于 2020-2-7 10:53:52
提升卡
置顶卡
变色卡
千斤顶
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2020-2-14 21:41:11
