第二港湾, 华人休闲之家

 找回密码
 注册帐号
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友
查看: 599|回复: 7

CNN被迫承認國會大廈死亡的警察不是被抗議者用滅火器打...

[复制链接]
发表于 2021-2-5 10:59:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
抗議者沒有殺任何警察。而懦夫警察殺死了愛國者退伍軍人。

Ashli Babbitt我們美國的愛國英雄!


https://nationalfile.com/medical ... xtinguisher-attack/
Medical Examiners Reportedly Say Capitol Cop Did NOT Die From Fire Extinguisher AttackCNN has been forced to admit that fallen Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick did not die from getting hit with a fire extinguisher by pro-Trump protesters. Sicknick’s lack of blunt force trauma puts to rest a left-wing narrative on his death. NATIONAL FILE was weeks ahead of CNN in reporting this fact. At this time, the mainstream media cannot credibly point to Trump supporters killing anyone during the Jan. 6 Capitol protest, whereas the Capitol Police shot and killed Air Force veteran and protester Ashli Babbitt.CNN reported in their eighth, ninth, and tenth paragraphs of this article: “According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true. One possibility being considered by investigators is that Sicknick became ill after interacting with a chemical irritant like pepper spray or bear spray that was deployed in the crowd. But investigators reviewing video of the officer’s time around the Capitol haven’t been able to confirm that in tape that has been recovered so far, the official said. The case could also be complicated if Sicknick had a preexisting medical condition. It could not be learned if he did.”






发表于 2021-2-5 14:26:02 | 显示全部楼层
假新闻就是这样扯淡
发表于 2021-2-5 23:32:33 | 显示全部楼层
ssgo2008 发表于 2021-2-5 14:26
假新闻就是这样扯淡

你的意思是说“CNN报道警察不是被灭火器砸死”是假新闻?意思就是说其实警察就是被灭火器砸的?哈
发表于 2021-2-5 23:36:38 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kaleege 于 2021-2-5 23:53 编辑

CNN报道事实,你们就说是“被迫”,被谁迫了?莫非是你们吗?

而且以前的新闻都说了,原因不确定,“据两个警察说”看见他被暴乱分子砸。(见后)
现在原因仍然是不确定,法医报告都没有公开发布,唯一的消息是“据一个警察说他听法医说”不是钝器砸的。
如实报道消息来源有什么错?

据这个警察说的就是假新闻?据那个警察说的就是真新闻?双标?就因为后面那个“据说”你比较爱听?两个都是道听途说的,至少前一个是一手目击消息,还有两个人。后一个是二手消息,只有一个人。
最终结果是什么样,等法医报告公布出来才算确定。

CNN才是如实报道,你们才是cherry picking。

还是那个结论:你们这些人对真假新闻没有半点分辨能力,都是听到一个自己爱听的消息就盲信。


https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/ ... e-capitol-dies.html
The circumstances surrounding Mr. Sicknick's deathwere not immediately clear, and the Capitol Police said only that he had “passed away due to injuries sustained while on duty.” At some point in the chaos — with the mob rampaging through the halls of Congress while lawmakers were forced to hide under their desks — he was struck with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/02/politics/brian-sicknick-charges/index.html
Findings from a medical examiner's review have not yet been released and authorities have not made any announcements about that ongoing process. According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma

发表于 2021-2-9 14:03:52 | 显示全部楼层
CNN被迫承認國會大廈死亡的警察不是被抗議者用滅火器打
很快就成了,國會大廈死亡的警察跟抗议者无关
然后就成了,國會大廈被袭击跟抗议者无关
没有抗议者袭击國會大廈这回事
神马事都没有发生过
川粉就是这么无耻,跟他们的川普爹一个德行
 楼主| 发表于 2021-2-10 10:09:16 | 显示全部楼层
gejkl 发表于 2021-2-9 14:03
CNN被迫承認國會大廈死亡的警察不是被抗議者用滅火器打
很快就成了,國會大廈死亡的警察跟抗议者无关
然后 ...

“國會大廈死亡的警察跟抗议者无关”,當然,他是自己心肌梗塞,動脈瘤,辣椒水過敏,催淚彈熏死的,總之是自己死的。與抗議者當然無關。
什麽是“國會大廈被袭击”?國會大廈是人民代表議事的地方,本來就對公衆開放,一個開放的國會大廈怎麽會被“襲擊”?不讓公眾進入是無能政府官員的責任,當然和抗議者無關。
你讀點歷史的話,就該知道歷來國家的首都和這個國家其他地方立場是對立的。而因此首都被血洗是世界歷史的常態。這種事情發生時,個人要知道該站在哪一方。“清空沼澤”並不是白喊的。
你自己從中國出來,願意美國變成中國嗎?不要這麽賤好不好?
发表于 2021-2-11 13:34:09 | 显示全部楼层
万得福 发表于 2021-2-10 10:09
“國會大廈死亡的警察跟抗议者无关”,當然,他是自己心肌梗塞,動脈瘤,辣椒水過敏,催淚彈熏死的,總之 ...

老万,你怎么不对Ashli Babbitt说一声:“噗嗤,叫你再砸玻璃爬窗户”?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册帐号

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|第二港湾

GMT-5, 2024-5-19 05:54 , Processed in 0.015960 second(s), 14 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表